Talk:The Grand Tournament

Order?

In which order should the cards be put? Alphabetical or depending on mana cost? I have put them in the former but now realised that GvG cards are sorted in the latter. And then, what's about Naxxramas and BRM?--Adûnâi (talk) 19:29, 9 August 2015 (UTC) Oh no, I understand! I back off my statement.--Adûnâi (talk) 21:37, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Why have these edits been removed?

Why is Burgle put after Cutpurse if they both are rare? Why is Draenei Totemcarver put after Healing Wave if they both are rare? Should they all follow alphabetical order? 21:07, 11 August 2015 (UTC) Also, why does Bash follow Bolster since now? It makes no sense to me, they both are common cards. Ah, they are in the order of Mana Costs, I understand.--Adûnâi (talk) 21:11, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

The Grand Tourney?

Yesterday I went to HearthPwn and I noticed they had 'The Grand Tourney' as the card set name and now we have it in the infoboxes in the wiki too. Should we change the title of this page and the corresponding template? -- Karol007 (talk) 20:30, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Maybe a bot can change 'from the Grand Tournament set' in the introduction to all the TGT cards to 'from the Grand Tourney set'. -- Karol007 (talk) 22:56, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

I was thinking I should mention this on the community portal, but I'm not really sure if anyone checks that page anyway (although we should start doing so). I've already asked for a bot to change all those over, along with some other minor changes. -- Taohinton (talk) 00:21, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

There's not exactly a legion of 'us', active users / editors, so you can even invite 'everyone' individually to check a page or a set of pages :-) -- Karol007 (talk) 01:32, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Expand the section?

Should the section TGT#Ranked Chest be expanded or would it be enough to add something like for more information, see Ranked#Rewards to it? If the latter would be preferable, should it be put as a subtitle or in the text? Then should the link to Ranked Play be removed from the text in either of cases? I don't know about consistency of such approach on Hearthstone Gamepedia--Adûnâi (talk) 10:28, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

I've noticed there are some differences e.g. "At the end of each season, players who have reached Rank 19 or higher" in The_Grand_Tournament#Ranked_Chest v. "At the end of each season, players who have reached Rank 20 or higher" in Ranked#Ranked_Chest but otherwise +1 for a prominent link to the main article. -- Karol007 (talk) 10:38, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

It definitely wants to be just about the change itself, not the main place for info about the system - that's on Ranked#Rewards. I've removed all the details, and left the official quote, since that does quite a good job of explaining the change and is also neat historically. The differences were due to me anticipating this change, and having updated the Ranked section but not this one. I've also revised that whole section a bit, and linked to the patch page for full changes details.

Pre-release (which is now past, patch-wise) it was for storing info re: incoming changes; post-release it's historical, and for directing people to the proper locations for such info, which is no longer this page. -- Taohinton (talk) 02:24, 21 August 2015 (UTC)