Talk:Lord Jaraxxus

From Hearthstone Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Mana cost[edit source]

This page doesn't mention the mana cost — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.101.44.136 (talk • contribs) 23:54, 15 December 2013‎

Sacred Trial[edit source]

Jaraxxus is no longer destroyed by Sacred Trial, this article should be fixed to reflect that CybeastID (talk) 19:58, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

I've added a couple of notes explaining it's bugged. In general, if you're confident enough, feel free to go ahead and make changes like this one. -- Taohinton (talk) 23:31, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

ANOTHER WILL TAKE MY PLACE[edit source]

Does he actually say that when playing another Jaraxxus? It appears to have been added on this March 12 edit, by an IP address with no other edits . I'm strongly inclined to think it's vandalism, but I want to be sure before I remove it. MetricTrout (talk) 19:22, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

About multiple versions of a card[edit source]

We are going to have multiple versions of a collectible card (same name, but different sets), and I found out that this is very difficult to manage properly. It would be easy if it was like Doom in the Tomb thing, because it only lasted about 2 months. After a few researches, I can confirm the Core set will work exactly like how Wild Event set did, except that we don't know how long a card can stay in the Core set. It may be even permanently.

The problem here is, I can't decide which version will be the main article of the card. Usually we have priority something like: 'Standard > Wild > Uncollectible > Battlegrounds > Duels > old Arena event > Boss cards' to name the article with brackets.

My first idea is to make the Legacy version as the main one, but it will belong to Wild, which has lower priority than Standard format cards. Here is the content I will replace  Lord Jaraxxus with after FitB launches: User:Use25/Sandbox2. I also made  Lord Jaraxxus and  Lord Jaraxxus for testing.

Another choice is to make the Core version as the main one, but I'm not sure how this will be handled. Obviously the Classic format version won't be the main one, since it doesn't feel like a bigger format than our old traditional two formats.

Wanna hear you guys' thoughts about this. Which version should we choose as the main article? Use25 (talk) 04:28, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

I think it makes sense to make the Core version the main one, since it's in Standard and Legacy is not. It will probably require a lot of upkeep both at the start of the Year of the Gryphon and the year after it. - Linneris (talk) 07:53, 27 February 2021 (UTC)